Islamabad, May 18, 2025 — Pakistan’s military leadership has reiterated the nation’s dedication to peace in the aftermath of a recent ceasefire with India. Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), emphasized that Pakistan is a responsible nation committed to regional stability, while cautioning that any future aggression would be met with a decisive response.Geo News+1The Express Tribune+1
In an interview with RT Arabic, Lt Gen Chaudhry stated, “We are not a violent nation; we are a serious nation. Our first priority is peace.” He highlighted that Pakistan’s actions are guided by its commitment to peace and regional stability. Dawn+1Geo News+1
The ceasefire, brokered on May 10, followed a period of intense military exchanges between India and Pakistan, sparked by a deadly attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22. India attributed the attack to Pakistan-based militants, a claim Islamabad has denied.
Lt Gen Chaudhry clarified that the ceasefire was initiated at India’s request, stating, “Let me put it on record: Pakistan never requested a ceasefire.” He added that Pakistan responded to India’s request after ensuring its own security measures were in place. The Express Tribune
While reaffirming Pakistan’s commitment to the ceasefire, Lt Gen Chaudhry warned that any future violations would be met with a “swift and assured response.” He emphasized that a serious escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbors could have catastrophic consequences, underscoring the importance of maintaining peace. @EconomicTimes+1Dawn+1Dawn+1Daily Excelsior+1
The Pakistani military spokesperson also addressed concerns over civilian casualties, asserting that Pakistan’s military operations are conducted with precision to avoid harm to civilians. He stated, “We will never target civilians. Even from Indian statements, did you find that Pakistan attacked anything other than military targets? No.” The Express Tribune+1Geo News+1
As both nations navigate the fragile ceasefire, Lt Gen Chaudhry called for sustained diplomatic engagement to address underlying issues and prevent future conflicts. He reiterated Pakistan’s commitment to resolving disputes through peaceful means and maintaining regional stability.
The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, urging both India and Pakistan to uphold the ceasefire and engage in constructive dialogue to ensure lasting peace in the region.
Sources
4o
You said:
help me to write 500 words news with title on this topic Lebanon Times calls Indian govt ‘cowards’ over X block
ChatGPT said:
Lebanon Times Labels Indian Government ‘Cowards’ Over X Account BanThe Guardian+1India TV News+1
May 18, 2025 — The Lebanese publication Lebanon Times has openly criticized the Indian government, calling it “cowards” following the blocking of its account on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) within India. The publication alleges that the ban was imposed due to its reporting on sensitive issues in India.
In a statement posted on X, Lebanon Times declared: “The Indian government banned our account for reporting TRUTH in India. They are really cowards.” X (formerly Twitter)
Context of the Ban
The Indian government’s action against Lebanon Times is part of a broader initiative to curb what it deems as misinformation and propaganda, especially in the wake of recent tensions in the region. Following the Pahalgam terror attack, India has intensified its efforts to control narratives on social media platforms. X revealed that it received executive orders from the Indian government to block over 8,000 accounts, including those of international news organizations and prominent users. The platform stated that non-compliance could lead to significant penalties, including fines and imprisonment of its local employees. The Indian Express+1@EconomicTimes+1
International Reactions
The blocking of Lebanon Times and other international media outlets has sparked concerns over press freedom and the Indian government’s approach to dissenting voices. Critics argue that such measures undermine democratic principles and the free flow of information.
While the Indian government maintains that its actions are aimed at preventing the spread of misinformation, organizations advocating for press freedom have called for greater transparency and adherence to international standards of free expression.
Broader Implications
This incident underscores the challenges faced by international media in regions with stringent information control. The tension between national security concerns and press freedom continues to be a contentious issue, with implications for how information is disseminated and consumed globally.
As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how the Indian government will address the criticisms and whether platforms like X will negotiate the balance between compliance with local laws and upholding principles of free expression.